Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

Winchester Holding Group

Sponsored by Winchester Holding Group·

Unknown· Inc · 0 classes· ● Low· PPM v1· Updated 26d ago
11 data notes
Unscored: pref_qualityUnscored: gp_timing_riskUnscored: alignmentLow-confidence extractionUnusual structureUnscored: absolute lp takeUnscored: fee dragUnscored: pref qualityUnscored: gp timing riskUnscored: alignmentInsufficient data
Run the numbers
Composite
median 35 · Other / Specialty
Pref Return
LP Take (Base)
median 42.6% · Other / Specialty
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
ticket size
Offering Size
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $875K · Fees $0 · GP $0
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KLPT1Return of Capital$500,000 · 57.1% of grossLPGPT4Residual Split (100% / 0%) · 42.9%Limited Partners · $375KGeneral Partner · $0pool fully distributed
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →

Deal diligence18 findings · worst high

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Document quality

Drafting defects found in the PPM prose — numeric inconsistencies, broken cross-references, unfilled placeholders, and defined-term problems. Each is shown with the offending quote and its page.

Numeric inconsistency — Article III, Section 2 director range

Medium

Director-count bound is self-contradictory: 'not less than one (1) and more than nine (9)' has no valid range; the conjunction should read 'nor more than nine'.

The authorized number of directors shall be not less than one (1) and more than nine (9) until changed by a duly adopted amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
PPM p.588% confidence

Broken cross-reference — Article IV, Section 1 subsections (a) and (b)

Low

Subsections (a) and (b) of the committee-authority carve-out are word-for-word duplicates (differing only in 'Law' vs 'law'), so one carve-out is missing or duplicated.

(a) the approval of any action which, under the General Corporation Law of Nevada also requires shareholders' approval or approval of the outstanding shares; (b) the approval of any action which, under the General Corporation law of Nevada also requires shareholders' approval or approval of the outstanding shares;
PPM p.885% confidence

Spelling / typo — Article II, Section 3

Low

Missing preposition: 'If the notice is not given with five (5) days' should read 'within five (5) days', distorting the notice deadline.

If the notice is not given with five (5) days after receipt of the request, the person or persons requesting the meeting may give the notice.
PPM p.178% confidence

Spelling / typo — Article II, Section 11(b)

Info

Broken record-date sentence: 'the day on which then Board accepts' ('then' for 'the') and 'whenever is later' (for 'whichever is later').

shall be at the close of business on the day on which then Board accepts the resolution relating to that action, or the thirtieth (30th) day before the date of such other action, whenever is later.
PPM p.476% confidence

Spelling / typo — Article V, Section 1

Info

Garbled sentence: 'Any member of officers may be held by the same person' should read 'Any number of offices may be held by the same person'.

Any member of officers may be held by the same person.
PPM p.882% confidence

Spelling / typo — Article V, Section 8

Info

Wrong conjunction in vice-president succession clause: 'In the absence of disability of the president' should read 'In the absence or disability of the president'.

In the absence of disability of the president, the vice presidents, if any, in order of their rank as fixed by the Board of Directors
PPM p.980% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Fees & Expenses). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the target offering size?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the fund's vintage year?

Low

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the minimum LP investment?

Low

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

8%
Coverage
1 answered0 partial12 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Gap
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?Gap
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?Gap
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?Gap
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?UnknownAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Gap
  • What is the target offering size?Gap
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Gap
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?Gap
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

No fees extracted from the PPM.

Service providers3 gaps

Legal Counsel
Gap
Not disclosed
No independent counsel named for investors. Common in small syndications where Manager and Fund share counsel — reduces independence. Verify during diligence.
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Unknown