Investment Committee Memo · Waterfalls
Seer Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Seer Capital Management · Unknown · Vintage 2018
—
Waterfalls composite LP-favorability score (0–100)
—
LP take (absolute)
—
Pref quality
—
Fee drag
—
GP alignment
—
Timing risk
Key economics
- Preferred return
- —
- Hurdle rate
- —
- LP / GP split
- —
- GP catch-up
- —
- GP clawback
- —
- GP commitment
- —
Diligence findings (15 · 7 high/critical)
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Fees & Expenses). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highUnfilled placeholder text — [ ]% (Section 4 Fees — service fee)Section 4 leaves the core service-fee percentage as an unfilled bracket placeholder, so the actual economic fee owed to Seer Capital is blank.
- highUnfilled placeholder text — [ ]% (Section 4 Fees — termination fee share)The termination-fee share percentage in Section 4 is also an unfilled bracket placeholder, leaving that economic term blank.
- mediumDDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the target offering size?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- lowDDQ gap: What is the minimum LP investment?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- infoSpelling / typo — amended from the to timeGarbled boilerplate phrase in the recitals: 'amended from the to time' should read 'amended from time to time'.
- infoSpelling / typo — construction its tarnsBroken phrase in the governing-law clause: 'construction its tarns' should read 'construction of its terms' ('tarns' is a misspelling of 'terms').
DDQ readiness — 15% covered
2 answered · 0 partial · 11 gaps of 13 standard questions.