Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

RSNPG Bristol Partners LLC

Sponsored by RSN Property Group Operations, LLC·

Multifamily RE· Equity· LLC · 3 classes· ● High· PPM v1· Updated 29d ago
2 data notes
Unusual structureAbove Waterfall Fees Stacked
Run the numbers
Composite
70.4
median 57 +13
Pref Return
8%
median 9.0% 1.0%
LP Take (Base)
93.5%
median 100.0% 6.5%
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
$50K
ticket size
Offering Size
$6M
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $825K · Fees $44K · GP $6K
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KGPFFees to Manager$43,750 · 5.0% of grossDT2Class D Promote on Class B O…$6,438 · 0.7% of grossresidual $825K
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →
Class structure · 3 classes· viewing as Class D Units

How RSNPG Bristol Partners LLC divides the cap table

The cascade above is filtered to Class D Units. Reset to blended view.

Deal diligence9 findings · worst critical

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Waterfall structure

Structural checks run against RSNPG Bristol Partners LLC's extracted waterfall. Each is a deterministic test — the numbers shown are proven from the PPM, not estimated.

All Distributions tier 1 over-allocates: shares sum to 200%, not 100%

Critical
First, one hundred percent (100%) to the Class B Members, pro rata in proportion to their respective Unpaid Preferred Return balances, until each Class B Member's Unpaid Preferred Return balance has been reduced to zero
PPM p.1395% confidence

All Distributions tier 2 over-allocates: shares sum to 200%, not 100%

Critical
Thereafter, (1) Ninety percent (90%) to the Class B Members, pro rata in proportion to their respective Class B Percentage Interests, and (2) Ten percent (10%) to the Class D Member
PPM p.1395% confidence

All Distributions tier 3 over-allocates: shares sum to 200%, not 100%

Critical
First, one hundred percent (100%) to the Class B Members, pro rata in accordance with their Unpaid Preferred Return balances until such time as each Class B Member's Unpaid Preferred Return balance has been reduced to zero
PPM p.1495% confidence

All Distributions tier 4 over-allocates: shares sum to 200%, not 100%

Critical
Second, one hundred percent (100%) to the Class B Members, pro rata in accordance with their respective Unreturned Capital Contributions balances, until each Class B Member's Unreturned Capital Contributions balance has been reduced to zero
PPM p.1495% confidence

All Distributions tier 5 over-allocates: shares sum to 200%, not 100%

Critical
Third, (1) ninety percent (90%) to the Class B Members, pro rata in proportion to their respective Class B Percentage Interests, and (2) ten percent (10%) to the Class D Member
PPM p.1495% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

69%
Coverage
9 answered0 partial4 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Preferred return of 8%.Answered
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?90% LP / 10% GP residual split.Answered
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?No GP catch-up.Answered
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?Waterfall type: Two-class structure (Class B 7% pref / Class C 8% pref); Class B has 90/10 LP/GP residual split, Class C has 100% to LP.Answered
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?Equity · Multifamily REAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Vintage 2026.Answered
  • What is the target offering size?Target offering of $5,500,000.Answered
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Minimum investment of $50,000.Answered
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?4 fee line item(s) extracted from the offering documents.Answered
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

Total load 10.00%
Fee
Trigger
Basis
Rate
At acquisition
Aggregate Purchase Price of the Property
2.50%
Monthly in arrears
Flat $50,000 per annum
0.00%
Monthly based on costs incurred
Hard and soft costs of new construction at the Property
5.00%
Monthly in arrears
Gross Revenues of the Property
2.50%

Service providers2 gaps

Legal Counsel
OK
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Counsel for the Company and the Manager (and its Affiliates) Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Multifamily RE