Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

Red Oak Capital Fund II, LLC

Sponsored by Red Oak Capital·

Unknown· LLC · 2 classes· ● Low· PPM v1· Updated 26d ago
2 data notes
Unusual structureUnscored: absolute lp take
Run the numbers
Composite
18.4
median 36 17
Pref Return
median 8.0% · Diversified Real Estate
LP Take (Base)
median 85.9% · Diversified Real Estate
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
$10K
ticket size
Offering Size
$2M
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $779K · Fees $96K · GP $0
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KGPFFees to Manager$96,250 · 11.0% of grossLPT1Return of Capital$500,000 · 57.1% of grossLPGPT4Residual Split (100% / 0%) · 31.9%Limited Partners · $279KGeneral Partner · $0pool fully distributed
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →
Class structure · 2 classes

How Red Oak Capital Fund II, LLC divides the cap table

The cascade above models the blended LP view. Click a class below to view per-class economics.

Deal diligence12 findings · worst high

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Document quality

Drafting defects found in the PPM prose — numeric inconsistencies, broken cross-references, unfilled placeholders, and defined-term problems. Each is shown with the offending quote and its page.

Unfilled placeholder text — www.[●].com

High

Unfilled bracketed placeholder token shipped to investors in place of the URL where the subscription agreement is hosted.

The subscription agreement is available at www.[●].com.
PPM p.3995% confidence

Spelling / typo — COMMISION

Info

Misspelling of 'COMMISSION' in the substantive SEC legend on the cover.

THESE SECURITIES ARE OFFERED PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION WITH THE SEC; HOWEVER, THE COMMISION HAS NOT MADE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION THAT THE SECURITIES OFFERED ARE EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION.
PPM p.497% confidence

Spelling / typo — Manger

Info

Repeated misspelling of the defined term 'Manager' as 'Manger' in the economics/fee disclosures (recurs at multiple places, e.g. the promotional-fee cap).

in no event will reimbursements to our Manager for organizational and offering expenses and the promotional fee payable to our Manger exceed 2.00% of the offering proceeds.
PPM p.290% confidence

Spelling / typo — Reimbersement

Info

Misspelling of 'Reimbursement' in the managing broker-dealer compensation table line item.

Less Expense Reimbersement
PPM p.3892% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

38%
Coverage
5 answered0 partial8 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Gap
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?Gap
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?Gap
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?Gap
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?UnknownAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Vintage 2010.Answered
  • What is the target offering size?Target offering of $2,000,000.Answered
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Minimum investment of $10,000.Answered
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?10 fee line item(s) extracted from the offering documents.Answered
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

Total load 20.20%
Fee
Trigger
Basis
Rate
Selling Commission - Series A Bonds
Bond sale
2.00% of gross offering proceeds on the sale of Series A Bonds
2.00%
Selling Commission - Series B Bonds
Bond sale
6.75% of gross offering proceeds on the sale of Series B Bonds
6.75%
Managing Broker-Dealer Fee
Bond sale
Up to 1.20% of the gross proceeds of the offering
1.20%
Wholesaling Fee
Bond sale through certain selling group members
Up to 1.00% of gross proceeds from certain sales of the Bonds
1.00%
Nonaccountable Expense Reimbursement
Bond sale
Up to 1.00% of the gross proceeds in the offering
1.00%
Organizational and Offering Expense Reimbursement
Offering
Up to 2.00% of gross proceeds; combined with Promotional Fee cannot exceed 2.00% in the aggregate
2.00%
Promotional Fee
Offering (only if organizational and offering expenses do not absorb full 2% cap)
Up to 2.00% of gross proceeds; combined with O&O reimbursement capped at 2.00% in aggregate
2.00%
Asset Management Fee - Series A Bonds
Ongoing / quarterly
2.00% per annum of the outstanding principal amount of Series A Bonds; paid quarterly in advance
2.00%
Asset Management Fee - Series B Bonds
Ongoing / quarterly
1.75% per annum of the outstanding principal amount of Series B Bonds; paid quarterly in advance
1.75%
Asset acquisition
0.50% of the cost of acquiring each asset, inclusive of any closing costs
0.50%

Service providers3 gaps

Legal Counsel
Gap
Not disclosed
No independent counsel named for investors. Common in small syndications where Manager and Fund share counsel — reduces independence. Verify during diligence.
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Unknown