Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

RAYVEN PROPERTIES, LLC

Sponsored by Rayven·

Unknown· LLC · 3 classes· ● Low· PPM v1· Updated 26d ago
3 data notes
Unusual structureLow-confidence extractionUnscored: absolute lp take
Run the numbers
Composite
13.3
median 36 23
Pref Return
median 8.0% · Diversified Real Estate
LP Take (Base)
median 85.9% · Diversified Real Estate
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
$250
ticket size
Offering Size
$75M
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $793K · Fees $82K · GP $0
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KGPFFees to Manager$81,875 · 9.4% of grossLPT1Return of Capital$500,000 · 57.1% of grossLPGPT4Residual Split (100% / 0%) · 33.5%Limited Partners · $293KGeneral Partner · $0pool fully distributed
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →
Class structure · 3 classes· viewing as Non-Voting Units

How RAYVEN PROPERTIES, LLC divides the cap table

The cascade above is filtered to Non-Voting Units. Reset to blended view.

Deal diligence18 findings · worst high

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Waterfall structure

Structural checks run against RAYVEN PROPERTIES, LLC's extracted waterfall. Each is a deterministic test — the numbers shown are proven from the PPM, not estimated.

Disposition Fee (2%) is taken above the waterfall

Medium

A performance- or transaction-linked fee paid above the waterfall reaches the GP before the LP's distribution priorities run, eroding the pool the pref + return-of-capital draw from. Routine asset-management fees above the line are normal; a disposition/promote-flavored fee there is a leak worth pricing.

The Company shall pay or cause the applicable Company Subsidiary to pay to Manager a disposition fee equal to 2% of the cash sale price of any Property acquired by the Company or a Company Subsidiary within five days after closing of the disposition of a Property.
PPM p.4585% confidence

Document quality

Drafting defects found in the PPM prose — numeric inconsistencies, broken cross-references, unfilled placeholders, and defined-term problems. Each is shown with the offending quote and its page.

Numeric inconsistency — Fund Management Fee / Asset Management Fee rates

High

The Manager's fee rates stated in the 'Compensation of Our Manager' section conflict with the same fees disclosed in the audited financial-statement related-party note (fund mgmt 0.175% vs .50% of capital; asset mgmt 2% vs 1.0% of gross revenue).

the Company is obligated to pay to the Manager (i) a quarterly 0.175% fund management fee (the 'Fund Management Fee'); (ii) a monthly 2% asset management fee (the 'Asset Management Fee') ... [vs.] the Manager shall receive a quarterly fee equal to .50% of the total capital of the Company ... The Company shall pay the Manager a monthly asset management fee of 1.0% of the monthly gross revenue generated by the Company's properties.
PPM p.4490% confidence

Defined-term defect — Investor Purchase Agreement / 'shares'

Medium

The arbitration provision references 'Section 13 of our Investor Purchase Agreement' and 'purchasing shares', but this is a Notes (not share) offering and the governing document is elsewhere called the 'Promissory Note Investor Agreement' / 'Note Purchase Agreement', creating ambiguity about which agreement binds investors.

By purchasing shares in this Offering, unless you opt-out in accordance with the terms of the Promissory Note Investor Agreement, you agree to be bound by the arbitration, jury waiver and class action waiver provisions contained in Section 13 of our Investor Purchase Agreement to be used for subscriptions on this offering.
PPM p.2270% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — $ 3.250,000 ) — Working Capital, 100% column

Medium

In the Use of Proceeds table the 100%-sold working-capital figure is malformed: it prints a decimal point instead of a thousands comma and carries a stray close-paren ('$ 3.250,000 )'); the intended value is $3,250,000 (5% of $65,000,000 net proceeds).

Working Capital and General Corporate Purposes (1) $ 750,000 $ 1,625,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 3.250,000 )
PPM p.3085% confidence

Unfilled placeholder text — Offering Circular date

Medium

The date of the Offering Circular is shipped unfilled — the day and month are blank, leaving only the year.

The date of this Offering Circular is , 2023
PPM p.390% confidence

Defined-term defect — Sharmaleau Holdings / Shamerleau Holdings

Low

The entity is named 'Sharmaleau Holdings, LLC' but is immediately given the defined-term shorthand 'Shamerleau Holdings' (transposed spelling), and the misspelled short form is then used throughout.

the sole member of Sharmaleau Holdings, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company ('Shamerleau Holdings'). Shamerleau Holdings holds 50% of the membership interests of LeavenWealth Holdings, LLC.
PPM p.3485% confidence

Document-quality defect — Amber Bouge / Amber Barrett

Low

Owen Barrett's spouse is named inconsistently within the same sentence — first 'Amber Bouge' and then 'Amber Barrett'.

Both AMBO Holdings and AMBO Management are controlled by Owen Barrett and his spouse Amber Bouge. Owen Barrett and Amber Barrett each beneficially own approximately 48% of AMBO Holdings.
PPM p.3480% confidence

Spelling / typo — 5019(c)(3)

Info

Typo in the President's biography — '5019(c)(3) organization' should read 501(c)(3).

In 2010, Mr. Barrett developed SustainaBall Change, a 5019(c)(3) organization.
PPM p.4385% confidence

Spelling / typo — Freddie Mae, Fannie Mac

Info

The agency lender names are swapped/misspelled as 'Freddie Mae, Fannie Mac'; the correct names are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (correctly stated as 'Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac' in the parallel Summary table).

Department of Housing and Urban Development program (HUD), Freddie Mae, Fannie Mac, Local banks, Commercial-Property Assessed Clean Energy
PPM p.3385% confidence

Spelling / typo — Mr. Pomerleau Mr. Pomerleau

Info

Doubled words ('Mr. Pomerleau Mr. Pomerleau') in Chris Pomerleau's biography.

Mr. Pomerleau Mr. Pomerleau received a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology from Augustana College in 2006
PPM p.4385% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

38%
Coverage
5 answered0 partial8 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Gap
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?Gap
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?Gap
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?Gap
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?UnknownAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Vintage 2023.Answered
  • What is the target offering size?Target offering of $75,000,000.Answered
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Minimum investment of $250.Answered
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?5 fee line item(s) extracted from the offering documents.Answered
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

Total load 7.17%
Fee
Trigger
Basis
Rate
Fund Management Fee
Quarterly, on total assets
0.175% of total assets of the Company as of the last day of each quarter, paid quarterly
0.18%
Monthly, on gross property revenue
2% of monthly gross revenue generated by the Properties, paid monthly in arrears
2.00%
At closing of each property acquisition
2% of the purchase price of any Property acquired, paid within five days after closing; if Property Guarantors exist, 1% of purchase price goes to them and remainder to Manager
2.00%
At closing of each property disposition/sale
2% of the cash sale price of any Property disposed of, paid within five days after closing
2.00%
Broker-Dealer Commission
On each closing of Note subscriptions
1% of gross offering proceeds raised; plus a one-time $25,000 set-up/consulting fee to Dalmore Group, LLC
1.00%

Service providers3 gaps

Legal Counsel
Gap
Not disclosed
No independent counsel named for investors. Common in small syndications where Manager and Fund share counsel — reduces independence. Verify during diligence.
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Unknown