Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

iCap Vault 1, LLC

Sponsored by iCap Equity·

Unknown· LLC · 1 class· ● Low· PPM v1· Updated 26d ago
2 data notes
Unusual structureUnscored: absolute lp take
Run the numbers
Composite
25.5
median 35 10
Pref Return
LP Take (Base)
median 42.6% · Other / Specialty
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
ticket size
Offering Size
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $845K · Fees $30K · GP $0
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KGPFFees to Manager$30,000 · 3.4% of grossLPT1Return of Capital$500,000 · 57.1% of grossLPGPT4Residual Split (100% / 0%) · 39.4%Limited Partners · $345KGeneral Partner · $0pool fully distributed
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →

Deal diligence17 findings · worst high

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Document quality

Drafting defects found in the PPM prose — numeric inconsistencies, broken cross-references, unfilled placeholders, and defined-term problems. Each is shown with the offending quote and its page.

Document-quality defect — Section 8.10(a)

Medium

Section 8.10(a) ends mid-sentence with a dangling phrase and no completion before subsection (b) begins, indicating the document was shipped unfinished.

accordance with the procedure established for the relevant
PPM p.3090% confidence

Defined-term defect — Adjustment Year

Low

The capitalized term 'Adjustment Year' is used in Section 6.2(h) but is never defined in Article 1 (only 'Reviewed Year' is defined).

not as of an applicable Adjustment Year, and the Persons signing this Agreement as a condition to becoming a Member hereby agree
PPM p.2480% confidence

Defined-term defect — Estimated Tax Period

Low

Section 3.5 uses the capitalized term 'Estimated Tax Period' as if defined and the trailing parenthetical mis-defines a different term ('Estimated Tax Distribution'); 'Estimated Tax Period' is never defined.

close of each Estimated Tax Period (each an “Estimated Tax Distribution”) of each Fiscal Year in amounts equal to
PPM p.1670% confidence

Defined-term defect — Fair Market Value

Low

Section 3.4 uses the capitalized term 'Fair Market Value' as if defined, but the agreement defines only 'Fair Value' in Section 1.1(s) - a wrong-term substitution.

the Fair Market Value of such property exceeds that liability) or, other than Distributions pursuant to Section 3.5, if such Distributions
PPM p.1575% confidence

Document-quality defect — Section 8.1(a) / 8.1(d)

Low

Section 8.1(d) is a verbatim duplicate of the prohibition already stated in Section 8.1(a), evidencing careless assembly.

No Members or group of Members, acting in its or their capacity as Members, shall have the right to call a meeting of the Members.
PPM p.2885% confidence

Spelling / typo — forgoing

Info

Misspelling of 'foregoing' as 'forgoing' in substantive text (recurs again on page 32 in Section 9.2).

Notwithstanding the forgoing, the parties hereto acknowledge that the Manager shall reject a proposed Transferee in the event
PPM p.1880% confidence

Spelling / typo — ligation

Info

Misspelling of 'litigation' as 'ligation' in substantive transfer-procedure text in Section 4.2(a).

of his, her or its current and historical business operations, any proven or charged criminal conduct, any ligation involving
PPM p.1885% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the target offering size?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the minimum LP investment?

Low

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

23%
Coverage
3 answered0 partial10 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Gap
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?Gap
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?Gap
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?Gap
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?UnknownAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Vintage 2018.Answered
  • What is the target offering size?Gap
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Gap
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?4 fee line item(s) extracted from the offering documents.Answered
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

Total load 2.00%
Fee
Trigger
Basis
Rate
Ongoing; quarterly payment
Annual fee equal to 1% of the outstanding aggregate principal balances of the Notes; paid quarterly in arrears on the last day of each calendar quarter, calculated on the average daily outstanding principal balances during the applicable quarter
1.00%
Guarantee Fee
When Manager or Affiliate guarantees a loan, bond or other obligation of the Company or its subsidiaries
Annual fee equal to 1% of the total amount of the credit facility, bond amount, or other obligation subject to the guarantee; payable by the benefiting entity to the guarantor
1.00%
Acquisition of real estate assets
Non-refundable fee charged to cover costs of due diligence and underwriting involved in closing a real estate purchase; amount not specified
0.00%
Sale of real estate assets
Fee charged to cover costs of closing a real estate sale; amount not specified
0.00%

Service providers3 gaps

Legal Counsel
Gap
Not disclosed
No independent counsel named for investors. Common in small syndications where Manager and Fund share counsel — reduces independence. Verify during diligence.
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Unknown