Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

BRIDGEWELL INCOME TRUST LLC

Sponsored by BridgeWell Capital·

Unknown· LLC · 0 classes· ● Low· PPM v1· Updated 26d ago
10 data notes
Unscored: pref_qualityUnscored: gp_timing_riskUnscored: alignmentLow-confidence extractionUnscored: absolute lp takeUnscored: fee dragUnscored: pref qualityUnscored: gp timing riskUnscored: alignmentInsufficient data
Run the numbers
Composite
median 36 · Diversified Real Estate
Pref Return
median 8.0% · Diversified Real Estate
LP Take (Base)
median 85.9% · Diversified Real Estate
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
ticket size
Offering Size
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $875K · Fees $0 · GP $0
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KLPT1Return of Capital$500,000 · 57.1% of grossLPGPT4Residual Split (100% / 0%) · 42.9%Limited Partners · $375KGeneral Partner · $0pool fully distributed
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →

Deal diligence16 findings · worst high

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Document quality

Drafting defects found in the PPM prose — numeric inconsistencies, broken cross-references, unfilled placeholders, and defined-term problems. Each is shown with the offending quote and its page.

Broken cross-reference — Article VII

Low

Article VIII Section 8 (Liability Insurance) cites 'this Article VII' but the enclosing article is Article VIII (Corporate Indemnification Plan); Article VII covers Dividends.

whether or not the Corporation would have the power to indemnify him against such liability under the provisions of this Article VII.
PPM p.1897% confidence

Defined-term defect — Indemnitee

Low

Capitalized term 'Indemnitee' used in Article VIII Section 11 but never defined in Article VIII Section 1's definitions list, which defines only Corporation, Expenses, Liability, Not Opposed to the Best Interest of the Corporation, Other Enterprises, Proceeding, and Serving at the Request of the Corporation.

the parties hereto agree that Indemnitee shall enjoy by this agreement the greater benefits so afforded by such law or provision of the Articles of Incorporation
PPM p.1988% confidence

Spelling / typo — election , on of directors

Low

Garbled text 'election , on of directors' — appears to be a broken/corrupted sentence fragment that should read 'election of directors'.

election , on of directors a statement specifying the persons paid, the amounts paid, and the nature and status at the time of such payment of the litigation or threatened litigation.
PPM p.1998% confidence

Spelling / typo — conference' telephone

Info

Errant apostrophe mid-word in 'conference' telephone' — likely a stray smart-quote or OCR artifact corrupting the phrase.

Members of the board of directors may participate in any regular or special meeting by means of a conference' telephone or similar communications equipment
PPM p.895% confidence

Spelling / typo — The directors or officer

Info

Subject-verb number mismatch: 'The directors or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled' — every parallel provision uses 'director or officer'; 'directors' here is inconsistent and grammatically broken.

The directors or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification or advancement of Expenses, or both, in view of all the relevant circumstances
PPM p.1890% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Fees & Expenses). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the target offering size?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the minimum LP investment?

Low

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

15%
Coverage
2 answered0 partial11 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Gap
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?Gap
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?Gap
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?Gap
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?UnknownAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Vintage 2012.Answered
  • What is the target offering size?Gap
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Gap
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?Gap
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

No fees extracted from the PPM.

Service providers3 gaps

Legal Counsel
Gap
Not disclosed
No independent counsel named for investors. Common in small syndications where Manager and Fund share counsel — reduces independence. Verify during diligence.
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Unknown