Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

The LP Advisory Committee (LPAC)

Composition, powers, and what triggers a vote.

5-min read

The LP advisory committee — LPAC — is the closest thing a private fund has to a board of directors. Unlike a corporate board, the LPAC has narrow, mostly-defensive powers and meets infrequently. But on the few questions where its consent is required, it's the only check on the GP between the LPA's defaults and a full LP vote.

What the LPAC does

LP Advisory Committee
A committee of LP representatives — typically 5-9 members, sometimes more — empowered by the LPA to approve specific actions that fall outside the GP's normal discretion. Common LPAC powers: approving affiliate transactions, ratifying principal transactions, consenting to LPA amendments, reviewing valuation methodology, and reviewing conflict-of-interest determinations.

The LPAC is intentionally limited. It can't direct the GP to make or skip a particular deal. It can't fire the GP. It can't override fund-level investment policy. It can only weigh in on specific questions enumerated in the LPA — and only when the GP brings those questions to it.

How LPACs are typically composed

Standard LPAC consent triggers

Most LPAs reserve a defined set of actions for LPAC approval. The list varies, but commonly includes:

What LPAC consent really means

LPAC consent is meant to substitute for full LP consent — and in most LPAs, an LPAC approval is binding on all LPs without further vote. That's efficient (you don't need to organize a 200-LP vote on every conflict review) and risky (5-9 LPs are speaking for the whole fund).

Two ways the substitution can fail:

What LPACs almost never do

If you're asked to serve

For larger LPs, an LPAC seat is occasionally offered as part of a side-letter package. Things to know before accepting:

  1. Meeting frequency. Usually quarterly, sometimes ad-hoc for specific consents.
  2. Information access. LPAC members typically receive more granular fund-level data than other LPs. Useful for diligence but also creates information-handling obligations.
  3. Conflict positioning. An LPAC member voting on an affiliate transaction in a fund they have a meaningful commitment to is making a fiduciary decision for the broader LP base. Take it seriously.
  4. Indemnification. Make sure the LPA indemnifies LPAC members for actions taken in good faith. Most do; verify.

For LPs who aren't on the LPAC, the practical implication is that LPAC composition is a meaningful signal about the fund's governance. A large, diverse, sophisticated LPAC is a stronger check on GP behavior than a small, friendly one. Ask who's on the LPAC during diligence.

← Back to Learning CenterBrowse the fund universe →