Investment Committee Memo · Waterfalls
WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIV LP
Wells Real Estate Investment Trust · Unknown · Vintage 2012
25
Waterfalls composite LP-favorability score (0–100)
—
LP take (absolute)
10
Pref quality
61
Fee drag
15
GP alignment
15
Timing risk
Key economics
- Preferred return
- —
- Hurdle rate
- —
- LP / GP split
- —
- GP catch-up
- —
- GP clawback
- —
- GP commitment
- —
Diligence findings (14 · 4 high/critical)
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the target offering size?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- lowDDQ gap: What is the minimum LP investment?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- lowDocument-quality defect — monthly report vs. Section 2.6(b)Internal inconsistency: text references 'the monthly report ... pursuant to Section 2.6(b)' but Section 2.6(b) is titled 'Quarterly Reports' and requires quarterly (not monthly) reporting.
- lowSpelling / typo — MangerMisspelling of the core defined term 'Manager' as 'Manger' in the Independent Contractor clause.
- infoSpelling / typo — ManagersWrong plural of the singular defined term 'Manager' ('Managers shall also report') in the Notices subsection.
- infoSpelling / typo — plannin gBroken word: 'planning' is split with a stray space ('plannin g') in the Other Management Fee Matters provision.
DDQ readiness — 23% covered
3 answered · 0 partial · 10 gaps of 13 standard questions.