Investment Committee Memo · Waterfalls
USA OPPORTUNITY INCOME ONE, INC.
USA Opportunity Income · Unknown · Debt · Vintage 2021
45
Waterfalls composite LP-favorability score (0–100)
—
LP take (absolute)
25
Pref quality
100
Fee drag
15
GP alignment
40
Timing risk
Key economics
- Preferred return
- —
- Hurdle rate
- —
- LP / GP split
- —
- GP catch-up
- —
- GP clawback
- —
- GP commitment
- —
Diligence findings (12 · 4 high/critical)
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- lowDocument-quality defect — USA REAL ESTATE OPPORTUNITIES INCOME, INC.The Index to Financial Statements is headed with a third fund-name variant that matches neither the current legal name ('USA Opportunity Income One, Inc.') nor the former name ('USA Opportunity Income Fund, Inc.') used elsewhere in the document.
- lowNumeric inconsistency — Related-party advances / organization & offering costs at August 31, 2021Audited balance sheet reports 'Advances from related party' of $54,102, but Note 2 states founders/affiliates paid $54,002 of organizational and offering costs as of the same date — a $100 discrepancy on the same quantity.
- infoSpelling / typo — case / dateDoubled/garbled wording in a cybersecurity risk factor: 'case' should be 'cause' and 'users date' should be 'users data'.
- infoSpelling / typo — oustandingMisspelling of 'outstanding' as 'oustanding' in a balance-sheet line item.
DDQ readiness — 38% covered
5 answered · 0 partial · 8 gaps of 13 standard questions.