Investment Committee Memo · Waterfalls
RealyInvest NNN, LLC
RealyInvest · Unknown · Vintage 2015
24
Waterfalls composite LP-favorability score (0–100)
—
LP take (absolute)
10
Pref quality
0
Fee drag
30
GP alignment
55
Timing risk
Key economics
- Preferred return
- —
- Hurdle rate
- —
- LP / GP split
- —
- GP catch-up
- —
- GP clawback
- —
- GP commitment
- —
Diligence findings (22 · 7 high/critical)
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDocument-quality defect — REIT election year 'December 31, 2015'REIT election described as commencing with a short taxable year ending December 31, 2015 — impossible for an entity formed March 17, 2020, and contradicts the December 31, 2021 election year stated elsewhere.
- highNumeric inconsistency — Offering-price derivation: $1,570,851 / 78,543 SharesThe $20.00 per-share derivation uses a property purchase price of 1,570,851 and 78,543 Shares, contradicting the $1,971,200 purchase price and 98,560 Total Maximum Shares used throughout the rest of the circular.
- highNumeric inconsistency — REIT election year 2015 vs 2021Same REIT election year stated two different ways: 'taxable year ending December 31, 2015' (tax section) versus 'taxable year ending December 31, 2021' on the cover/summary.
- mediumDDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDocument-quality defect — 'our 2015 taxable year'Tax-treatment discussion again references electing REIT status 'beginning with our 2015 taxable year', impossible for a March 2020 entity and inconsistent with the December 31, 2021 election year.
- mediumDocument-quality defect — Property location 'La Porte, IN' + stray 'Starbucks Corporation]'Cover description places the NNN-1 Property in La Porte, IN with a stray closing bracket after 'Starbucks Corporation', contradicting the Marietta, Ohio location used throughout — apparent leftover from a different deal template.
- mediumNumeric inconsistency — Credit Facility $1,973,200 vs $1,971,200Forecasted balance sheet shows a Credit Facility / total liabilities of $1,973,200, but footnote (5) and the purchase price state the Credit Facility is $1,971,200.
- lowDocument-quality defect — Lease expiration 'November 31, 2030'Lease/agreement expiration date is stated as November 31, 2030 — an impossible date, as November has only 30 days.
- lowNumeric inconsistency — Formation date 'December 2019' vs 'March 17, 2020'The Company's formation is stated as 'December 2019' in the management discussion, but as 'March 17, 2020' on the cover, in the summary, and in the audited financial statements.
- infoSpelling / typo — 'ACCOOUNTING'Misspelling of 'ACCOUNTING' as 'ACCOOUNTING' in the financial-statement note heading.
- infoSpelling / typo — 'businesss'Misspelling of 'business' as 'businesss' (triple s) in a REIT tax risk factor.
- infoSpelling / typo — 'dailyu Closings'Misspelling of 'daily' as 'dailyu' in the offering-period mechanics describing how Closings are conducted.
- infoSpelling / typo — 'FACTA'The defined term 'FATCA' is misspelled 'FACTA' within the same FATCA withholding paragraph that elsewhere spells it correctly.
- infoSpelling / typo — 'in whole or in party''in whole or in part' mis-rendered as 'in whole or in party' in the Credit Facility prepayment bullet.
- infoSpelling / typo — 'lessess''lessees' misspelled as 'lessess' (twice) in the risk-factor text on tenant/guarantor financials.
- infoSpelling / typo — 'mad ein'Broken word — 'made in' rendered as 'mad ein' in the compulsory-redemption provision.
DDQ readiness — 38% covered
5 answered · 1 partial · 7 gaps of 13 standard questions.