Investment Committee Memo · Waterfalls
Realm Metaverse Real Estate Inc.
Republic Realm · Unknown · Vintage 2021
8
Waterfalls composite LP-favorability score (0–100)
—
LP take (absolute)
5
Pref quality
0
Fee drag
15
GP alignment
10
Timing risk
Key economics
- Preferred return
- —
- Hurdle rate
- —
- LP / GP split
- —
- GP catch-up
- —
- GP clawback
- —
- GP commitment
- —
Diligence findings (13 · 5 high/critical)
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highNumeric inconsistency — Class A / Class B authorized sharesAuthorized share counts in the audited balance sheet (and Note 4) contradict the body of the circular: the balance sheet states Class A = 80,000 / Class B = 20,000, while the 'Securities Being Offered' section and Note 6 state Class A = 20,000 / Class B = 160,000.
- mediumDDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumIncentive Management Fee (25%) is taken above the waterfallA performance- or transaction-linked fee paid above the waterfall reaches the GP before the LP's distribution priorities run, eroding the pool the pref + return-of-capital draw from. Routine asset-management fees above the line are normal; a disposition/promote-flavored fee there is a leak worth pricing.
- lowNumeric inconsistency — Metajuku project size: 16,000 sq ft vs 256 sq mThe Metajuku development is described as '16,000 square foot (256 square meter)', but the two figures are not equivalent (16,000 sq ft is approximately 1,486 sq m; 256 sq m is approximately 2,756 sq ft), so the parenthetical conversion is wrong.
- infoSpelling / typo — 96 blocks of withTypo in the description of a Sandbox LAND parcel: 'with' is written where 'width' is meant ('96 blocks of depth, 96 blocks of with, and 128 blocks of height').
- infoSpelling / typo — the a third party service providerBroken phrasing with a doubled/stray article: 'with the a third party service provider' should read 'with a third party service provider'.
DDQ readiness — 38% covered
5 answered · 0 partial · 8 gaps of 13 standard questions.