Investment Committee Memo · Waterfalls
Our Microlending LLC
Our Microlending LLC · Unknown · Debt · Vintage 2019
18
Waterfalls composite LP-favorability score (0–100)
—
LP take (absolute)
15
Pref quality
—
Fee drag
20
GP alignment
20
Timing risk
Key economics
- Preferred return
- —
- Hurdle rate
- —
- LP / GP split
- —
- GP catch-up
- —
- GP clawback
- —
- GP commitment
- —
Diligence findings (10 · 4 high/critical)
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- lowNumeric inconsistency — 2018 rent expense ($54,140 vs $57,140)The audited 2018 rent figure is stated two ways: the Statement of Operations shows Rent of 54,140 for 2018, but Note 16 states rent expense was $57,140 for the same period.
- infoSpelling / typo — DESBroken sentence with garbled token 'DES' where a verb (e.g. 'diluted'/'infringed') is missing, leaving the risk-factor clause incomplete.
DDQ readiness — 38% covered
5 answered · 0 partial · 8 gaps of 13 standard questions.