Investment Committee Memo · Waterfalls
MHPI V, LLC
MHP Management, LLC · Mobile Home Parks · Equity · Vintage 2015
57
Waterfalls composite LP-favorability score (0–100)
84
LP take (absolute)
82
Pref quality
0
Fee drag
28
GP alignment
42
Timing risk
Key economics
- Preferred return
- 8%
- Hurdle rate
- —
- LP / GP split
- 80% / 20%
- GP catch-up
- No
- GP clawback
- No
- GP commitment
- —
Diligence findings (8 · 3 high/critical)
- criticalAll Distributions tier 7 over-allocates: shares sum to 180%, not 100%
- highDDQ gap: Do investors have the right to remove the manager / general partner?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Are material amendments to the operating agreement subject to investor consent?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Is there a key-person provision?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- lowNo clawback provision — promote paid is not trued-up to the LP at wind-downThe fund pays the GP carried interest but has no clawback. If interim distributions over-pay promote relative to lifetime results, the LP cannot recover the difference. Common in real-estate funds, but worth confirming against the distribution timing.
DDQ readiness — 68% covered
13 answered · 0 partial · 6 gaps of 19 standard questions.