Investment Committee Memo · Waterfalls
Groundfloor Loans 2 LLC
Groundfloor Finance · Unknown · Vintage 2015
36
Waterfalls composite LP-favorability score (0–100)
—
LP take (absolute)
10
Pref quality
88
Fee drag
20
GP alignment
25
Timing risk
Key economics
- Preferred return
- —
- Hurdle rate
- —
- LP / GP split
- —
- GP catch-up
- —
- GP clawback
- —
- GP commitment
- —
Diligence findings (10 · 5 high/critical)
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highNumeric inconsistency — Organization and Offering Expenses ($105,000 vs $150,000)The Estimated Use of Proceeds table lists Organization and Offering Expenses as $105,000 (yielding Net Proceeds of $74,895,000), but the table's own footnote (2) and the Summary fee table describe those same expenses as $5,000 of organizational costs plus up to $145,000 of legal fees ($150,000 total) — the $105,000 figure understates expenses by $45,000 and overstates net proceeds.
- mediumDDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- lowNumeric inconsistency — Company telephone numberThe Company's principal telephone number is stated as (404) 850-9225 on the cover and in the Summary, but as (404) 850-9223 in the Terms of the Offering section — the same contact number is recorded two different ways.
DDQ readiness — 38% covered
5 answered · 0 partial · 8 gaps of 13 standard questions.