Investment Committee Memo · Waterfalls
CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND LLC
Cornerstone Realty Advisors · Unknown · Vintage 2005
15
Waterfalls composite LP-favorability score (0–100)
—
LP take (absolute)
10
Pref quality
—
Fee drag
15
GP alignment
20
Timing risk
Key economics
- Preferred return
- —
- Hurdle rate
- —
- LP / GP split
- —
- GP catch-up
- —
- GP clawback
- —
- GP commitment
- —
Diligence findings (12 · 6 high/critical)
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highDDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- highNumeric inconsistency — Initial / Acceptance FeeExhibit A (General Provisions) states the initial non-refundable set-up fee is $1,500.00, but Exhibit B (Schedule of Fees) lists the Acceptance Fee (Non-Refundable) as $1,000.00 — a $500 discrepancy.
- highUnfilled placeholder text — __________, 2003 / ___________, 2004Three date blanks left unfilled in the executed agreement: the agreement effective date, the Prospectus date, and the Minimum Offering Termination Date are all blank placeholders.
- mediumDDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- mediumDDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.
- lowSpelling / typo — (iii) missing in investment listSection 5 enumerates investment options as (i), (ii), then '(iii) or (iv)' — item (iii) is missing and the text jumps nonsensically to a combined '(iii) or (iv)', indicating a deleted clause was not renumbered.
- lowSpelling / typo — costs end expensesTypographical error: 'end' used where 'and' is clearly intended in the CANCELLATION clause.
DDQ readiness — 38% covered
5 answered · 0 partial · 8 gaps of 13 standard questions.